The sunken ‘NIMASA-Barugu’ vessel: Matters arising
On Sunday, April 3rd, 2022, a video emerged on social media where a patrol vessel with the inscription NIMASA-Barugu on it and belonging to Messers Global West Specialist Vessels Limited sank in Lagos. The boat was one of the vessels owned by GWSVL and deployed for patrol during the implementation of a contractual agreement between the company and NIMASA.
However things went sour when in 2015 the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), started investigating the contract and instituted criminal cases against Global West Specialist Vessels Limited (GWSVL), and more importantly key NIMASA staff were charged to court for criminal related offences. NIMASA Senior Accountants, Auditors and other senior staff who were not charged to court were made to report at the EFCC every other day to answer questions on the PPP transaction involving Global West.
Eventually GWSVL escaped in a no-case submission against the criminal trial. However, this has nothing to do with the cases instituted by GWSVL against the agency for claims ranging from breach of contract to demands for further damages for deliberately breaching the contract.
If GWSVL wants NIMASA to assist with maintenance and other sundry expenses of their vessels, won’t they withdraw or suspend the cases instituted by it against NIMASA? But GWSVL prefers to eat their cake and have it. They insisted on going full steam ahead with the cases while applying all sorts of pressure through NGOs, Government Ministries, including the Media amongst others to force NIMASA to resume making payments to them.
If GWSVL were dealing in good faith, once done with the criminal charges, they should have approached the agency for settlement.
But no, instead they went ahead to obtain an arbitration judgement against their erstwhile partners and co-sufferers of the specter of criminal allegations.
Thereafter, they proceeded to seek an experte court order to enforce the arbitral award and attach the agency’s accounts, while the agency was completely unaware against the very doctrines of fairness equity and justice.
At this point, NIMASA had no option but to begin to defend itself. The agency have done this resolutely, unflinchingly with single minded focus ignoring the noisy attempts by GWSVL as mentioned earlier to pressurize NIMASA into paying their bills while they awaited the crystallization of the proceeds of unfairly obtained judicial decisions.
Despite all these obvious challenges, the NIMASA management under this administration made concerted efforts towards reactivating the few serviceable boats in the fleet of GWSVL, but was constrained by the legal encumbrances due to the nature of the cases in court. As a law abiding entity, NIMASA approached the mater under sound legal advisory.
On the sunk ‘NIMASA-Barugu’ vessel
At this juncture, it is imperative to state that the vessel which sank on Sunday the third of April somewhere in Kirikiri Lagos is solely the property of GWSVL. The vessel is in sole possession of GWSVL , and the vessel is also under technical and economic control of GWSVL.
Therefore GWSVL and no one else takes responsibility for the sinking of the vessel.
Assuming the vessel sank while trading in Nigerian waters, then the MARAD, in this case, NIMASA could be held liable for issuing safety certification while vessel was unseaworthy.
NIMASA is not responsible for vessels kept in anchorage for years without proceeding on any voyage where it may constitute a danger to its crew, other vessels or the marine environment.
NIMASA can confirm that the crew onboard are safe, and preliminary arrangements to mitigate against pollution of the marine environment around the Kirikiri axis is being made, while signing the area as dangerous to warn other users of the channel.
NIMASA as an agency of government remains committed to her statutory responsibility of administering safety and regulating the industry within the ambit of every legal framework.
Chukwuma Moghalu, a staff of NIMASA wrote from Lagos.